Home -> News -> Dispute with Standard Chartered Bank

UNION YES NEWSLETTER
March 1999
	Home
	Editorial
	Organising
NEWS FLASH
Year 2001
Year 2002
Year 2003
Year 2004
Year 2005
News Flash 2006
01 January 2006
28 March 2006
15 April 2006
26 April 2006
31 July 2006
08 August 2006
28 August 2006
30 August 2006
01 September 2006
18 September 2006
29 September 2006
06 October 2006
14 October 2006
24 November 2006
Year 2007
Year 2008
SBEU PUBLICATION
High Crime, Low Wages - Who Gains?
Sarawak Labor Ordinance
Merger of Banks & Financial Institution
Increase Retirement Age
Customer First ?
Adapt or Die
Industrial Court Awards


*Lies contained in letter signed by Head of Human Resources*
Stanchart HIDES THE TRUTH!
*AND HERE IS THE PROOF*

At the very outset of the dispute SBEU has made it clear that to resolve the dispute the STL must be restored in full. We EVEN are prepared to allow the STL to perform the new roles as decided by the bank, but the STLA must remain as a personal to holder basis as provided by under Article 36 of the CA. This is SBEU‘s letter dated 27 January 2005 (1 year and 7 months ago) to the bank:

Our position was reiterated to the Bank during the conciliation meeting held at the Industrial Relations Department and another meeting between SCBA/SBEU in the presence of other Banks HR Managers. To claim that only now that SBEU wants arrears is a blatant lie and an attempt to hoodwink SBEU members. It is calculated misrepresent the truth to its own employees Can we trust the bank anymore?